10 Reasons the AV-8 Harrier Broke the Rules of Military Aviation and Changed V/STOL Warfare

MilitaryLeave a Comment on 10 Reasons the AV-8 Harrier Broke the Rules of Military Aviation and Changed V/STOL Warfare

10 Reasons the AV-8 Harrier Broke the Rules of Military Aviation and Changed V/STOL Warfare

The place the AV-8 Harrier holds in the history of military aircraft is an uncommon one. This is on account of the fact that the craft was one of the only ones to question the most obvious postulate behind the fighting machine- that any serviceable fighters or attackers must use runways. The US Marines recently saw the retirement of this legendary platform from its lines, after 55 years of service, this time to a service that became well known for the peculiar feat of both vertical taking off and landing, or STOVT. Former Harrier pilot Paul Tremelling views the craft using the concept of battlefield and logistical usability and ingenious adequacy.

Powering this peculiar attribute was one turbofan with 4 articulated nozzles (Figure 1 and 3). These nozzles were able to translate turbine drive and/or turbine work from forward flight toward downward flight to permit landing/operation from facilities not accessible by any conventional jet aircraft. The front operating environment, short strips, rudimental operating fields, aircraft carriers, and amphibious assault ships could all be perceived as possible air bases. By changing not how to gain by just design alone but to make positioning of the aircraft and flexibility of basing part of its warfare; the Harrier has revolutionized how tactical support is perceived.

1. Being There at Forward Locations

There is little merit in having the “fastest” or the most heavily armed or the most manoeuvrable of aircraft if an actual of combat of this stature takes place; an aircraft that can actually be where you need it when you need it provides a very different sort of support to the other element, the troops. To this theme the example of the 1982 Falklands war with the operation of the Sea Harrier FRS Mk 1 and Harriers GR3s shows this quite vividly; due to the constraint of where conventional runway-based aircraft could and could not operate the aircraft found there niche simply through it being available.

Forward Operations Highlights:

  • Immediate battlefield air support
  • Short-strip operating capability
  • Primitive landing site access
  • Rapid operational turnaround
  • Close support near troops

Its ability to operate from such limited surfaces-even basic landing sites, small regional airfields, and grass strips-with such minimal support footprint proved valuable to its commander and Joint Terminal Attack Controllers over Belize, the Falklands, and Kandahar. The ability to have close support in relation to conflict sites rather than having to rely solely on a few far-flung airfields, and the time it takes for aircraft to close on their objective was a significant advantage in providing close air support to ground units.

2. Flexible Sea-Basing Capabilities

The Harrier’s ability to take off and land vertically also revolutionised where aircraft could be based at sea tactically. Standard tactical jet aircraft had to be supported by a large carrier or land facility and in the Harrier case they could do this off of aircraft and assault ships in a situation that did not necessitate conventional running environment. Commanders could make a commander deploy the air-craft wherever he felt they needed to be, using the sea. As mobile deployable facility.

Sea-Basing Highlights:

  • Aircraft carrier operations
  • Amphibious ship deployment
  • Mobile staging capability
  • Reduced land-based dependence
  • Flexible tactical positioning

The operation of tactical jet aircraft from the surface of ships “opened a pathway for transiting airpower over wide seas without having to secure transit rights or base accommodations from intervening countries.” Aircraft can be brought to the point of decision, trained pilots and aircraft maintainers can operate in the difficult maritime environment of their aircraft, and surprise is possible as forces are able to stand off or strike from unanticipated base locations when not bound to land based air fields. The Harrier contributed to showing how V/STOL could merge naval mobility and tactical flying to establish an alternative form of basing.

Harrier” by BillBl is licensed under CC BY 2.0

3. V/STOL Fuel Savings and Operational Flexibility

Civilian aircraft face the problem of increased fuel demands which may occur as a result of unforeseeable operational problems that need to be overcome. Adverse weather, crosswinds and blocked or broken runways are all factors that would put more strain on civilian aircraft. VSTOL for the Harrier means that it is possible to have a difficult conventional landing scenario for a pilot but still be able to operate. When a conventional approach is not possible, then any available flat surface would suffice and need not be a perfectly operational runway.

V/STOL Flexibility Highlights:

  • Reduced runway dependence
  • Vertical landing capability
  • Alternative landing surfaces
  • Lower contingency requirements
  • More flexible operations

This might also impact contingency fuel requirements for particular missions; were the runway damaged, or did a previous aircraft create an obstacle, a Harrier could perhaps land on the taxiway or some other surface instead. Limiting unnecessary contingencies would save unneeded weight and preserve space for mission equipment. The core benefit then was not the hovering ability but rather, the increased options it provided the command and the pilot when the normal options were unavailable or not functional.

Pilot's perspective of flying over clouds and mountains, capturing the breathtaking view.
Photo by Rhys Abel on Pexels

4. Superior Cockpit Canopy Visibility

The role of the pilot at close air support places a great premium on situation awareness; the close-working pilot must spot the target, track the friendly aircraft in his surroundings and be constantly aware of hostile ground threats, as well as terrain. The Harrier cockpit was built around this requirement, with an enormous canopy giving the pilot a far greater and less restricted field of vision.

Visibility Highlights:

  • Expansive cockpit canopy
  • Broad forward visibility
  • Minimal structural obstruction
  • Strong ground awareness
  • Improved tactical observation

Canopy configuration in the AV-8B and all other versions of the Harrier is such that the pilot is effectively enclosed in transparency. Other than the canopy rail there are remarkably few structural items obstructing the forward field of vision and this was an important feature on low level bombing and close support missions where rapid identification of ground targets and the surrounding terrain was important. The very wide panoramic field of vision works with the other systems on these aircraft by placing an emphasis on visual reference to the battlefield rather than on reliance on internal or external sensors.

Modern aircraft cockpit showcasing advanced technology and digital control panels.
Photo by Joerg Mangelsen on Pexels

5. Integrated Cockpit Avionics and Systems

That unique handling of the Harrier turned from one the type’s main advantage as later versions boasted a cockpit and mission systems based on increasingly complex digital technology. Strike missions now demand a pilot to assimilate navigational data, targets, weapons, sensor information all the while piloting his aircraft. The cockpit of the Harrier combines this by showing this information on big digital displays combined with moving maps, aiming details, terrain contours and so forth.

Avionics Highlights:

  • Large digital displays
  • Moving-map navigation
  • Targeting pod feeds
  • Terrain elevation database
  • Secure tactical communications

The mission computers would accept grid refs or coordinates, which with a predictive text function enabled the weapon computers to arm and select guided weapons like the Paveway IVs with a range and bearing from the Harrier, FRAs had their advantages in dust and bad weather low flying or low level into the winter sun and Secure frequency-agile radios assisted in achieving communication. The result was a modern, low level strike aircraft based upon a radically unconventional high-performance short field operating bird. The aircrew having access to a load of data without having to leave the cockpit.

Indian Air Force Tejas fighter jet soaring in clear blue skies, demonstrating agility and speed.
Photo by Aseem Borkar on Pexels

6. Single-Seat Efficiency and Human-Machine Interface

The pilot to aircraft interaction is relatively unique as well; being single-seated; there is only a single point where the system, aircraft, and man interface. While ground support operationally will involve task-filling as far as target coordinates and sensor data coupled with navigation data and communication data with respect to flight control; human-machine interface designs become relatively critical in this case since there is no co-pilot to assume some aspects of a workload.

Single-Seat Highlights:

  • One pilot per aircraft
  • Direct mission data access
  • Integrated cockpit information
  • Rapid tactical decisions
  • Streamlined crew requirements

This presented crucial information about target coordinates to the pilot and, displays showing targeting information, and displayed the feed to the cockpit instruments for use by a single pilot enabling quick tactical decisions during challenging close air support operations. Furthermore, the configuration was more economical to organizationally because single-seat, rather than two-man, tactical crews would be required for each aircraft in the unit. In the context of military planning, it would translate to a decrease in crew requirements and a resultant decrease in required personnel to maintain each aircraft. The Harrier managed to have a single-seat tactical configuration while at the same time, the battlefield information was getting richer.

Close-up of a missile mounted on a military aircraft wing at an airshow in Bengaluru, India.
Photo by Aseem Borkar on Pexels

7. Capable Air-to-Air Defense Characteristics

Even though the Harrier is an attack and ground-attack focused type of aircraft, it was no sitting duck operating over denied airspace. Numerous defensive systems have been introduced onto the Harrier so that the pilot is forewarned about potential danger and can make evades. Countermeasure system, Missile Approach Warner and TERMAPod (equipped with missile detector sensors) all were fitted to offer protection.

Air Defense Highlights:

  • Missile approach warning
  • Defensive countermeasures
  • TERMA detection pod
  • AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles
  • APG-65 radar integration

The two models, along with later variants were capable of carrying AIM-9L, AIM-9M Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles, also, performing well with basic fighter maneuvers, especially within the confined single-circle maneuver and during a low-speed confrontation utilizing its thrust vectoring, possible of an irregular capability of flight. As much as an improvement was seen, with later models utilizing APG-65 radar further increasing air to air capabilities by the ability to utilize medium-range AMRAAM, this greatly increased the fighter defense ability of a strike aircraft that is already able to maintain a unique ability among the current advanced weapons to carry an advanced air-to-air weapon.

8. Versatile Weaponry and Payload Capacity

The Harrier was designed to carry and deliver a wide variety of weapons, permitting the same airframe to satisfy multiple needs tactically. AV-8B types in the US arsenal have a 25mm cannon that has a capacity of 300 rounds per vehicle and a total of six underwing hardpoints to hold bombs and/or rockets. Equipped to its maximum, it has the ability to provide some significant firepower from an unconventional and not so typical location

Weapons and Payload Highlights:

  • 25-millimeter cannon
  • Six underwing hardpoints
  • Freefall attack bombs
  • CRV-7 rocket pods
  • Precision-guided weapons

Its standard weapons ranged between 540-pound and 1,000-pound retarded and free-fall bombs fusing them to hit upon impact or airburst. Rockets could also be employed in an attacking capacity in the shape of 19-round and 6-round rocket pods for an operational and training configuration, respectively, of CRV-7 rockets to deliver ordnance to a target on the ground. To attack at close range against more accurately directed attacks there existed TV guided and IR guided Maverick missiles, together with a range of families of precision guided bombs. Paveway, Enhanced Paveway, Enhanced Paveway plus, Paveway III and Paveway IV weapons gave the platform a variety of precision delivery options which meant the Harrier was a multi-role aircraft rather than a specialized variant.

9. Upgraded Pegasus Engine Performance

The most important system about the identity of the Harrier was its engine, a Rolls-Royce Pegasus, but advances to the Pegasus system further enhances capabilities. These airframes, GR7A and GR9A, utilized up-rated version of Pegasus turbofan engines that provide a more power. Having more engine power was important on airframes that are depended on having enough power to vertically or short take-off.

Pegasus Engine Highlights:

  • Uprated Pegasus turbofan
  • Increased available thrust
  • Safer vertical take-offs
  • Improved short-strip performance
  • Greater weapons bring-back capacity

The increased thrust gave improved vertical take-off capability and enabled operation on and over short strips, also short take-off capability would have been increased. The increased power also would enable the carriage of additional weapons, and enhance ‘bring back’ on return if stores were unfired. It also could enable higher climbs after clearing the ground, (where there could be other dangers as well as air threats) or enhance manoeuvre ability while airborne. All this increased power could potentially make even more use in hostile ‘hot and high’ operating environments where generation of appropriate air vehicle performance is normally impaired; thus, the increase in engine thrust was one thing that really put the Harrier apart.

a fighter jet flying through a cloudy blue sky
Photo by Leandro Mogni on Unsplash

10. The Sum of All Brilliant Adequacy

The Harrier’s greatest strength was never simply one isolated feature. Its value came from the way its individual capabilities worked together. A single aircraft could operate from short strips, carry substantial weapons, use targeting and reconnaissance equipment, employ defensive countermeasures, and operate from amphibious ships. The combination created a highly adaptable tactical platform that could be positioned in places where conventional aircraft might face greater limitations.

Harrier Legacy Highlights:

  • Multi-role tactical capability
  • Short-strip operations
  • Sea-based deployment
  • Advanced mission systems
  • Exceptional operational flexibility

The Harrier’s ability to operate at night, navigate through dust, land with limited fuel, and launch from unconventional locations gave commanders exceptional flexibility. Forest gaps, highway strips, forward bases, and amphibious ships could all become part of its operational environment. Its Pegasus engine, broad cockpit visibility, digital systems, flexible weapons, and V/STOL capability allowed it to solve practical battlefield problems where conventional aircraft could face limitations. After 55 years of American military service, the AV-8 Harrier leaves a lasting legacy by proving that battlefield adaptability and flexible basing could be just as valuable as conventional aircraft performance.

John Faulkner is Road Test Editor at Clean Fleet Report. He has more than 30 years’ experience branding, launching and marketing automobiles. He has worked with General Motors (all Divisions), Chrysler (Dodge, Jeep, Eagle), Ford and Lincoln-Mercury, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and Toyota on consumer events and sales training programs. His interest in automobiles is broad and deep, beginning as a child riding in the back seat of his parent’s 1950 Studebaker. He is a journalist member of the Motor Press Guild and Western Automotive Journalists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top